6.8 is coming.

You're lying. LR doesn't use multicores, so a single or 8 core wont make a difference

mhenr18 wrote:You're lying. LR doesn't use multicores, so a single or 8 core wont make a difference

you stole mah argument!

curses!

CNR wrote:O>O you know what CNR stands for?!

I could see it from a mile away.

(no i am not chuck norris)

KillinTime2792 wrote:

mhenr18 wrote:You're lying. LR doesn't use multicores, so a single or 8 core wont make a difference

you stole mah argument!

curses!

Wouldn't that imply that everyone should lag at the same amount of lines? And besides last time I checked I wasn't lying

Well, the speed of the single core is important too. Also, your RAM, your hard disk, all those things contribute.

Also, being on a mac is an instant performance hit, macs are [I am a potty mouth] at flash.
But LR can't use multicores, and 550k lines isnt possible, youd be whoring so much memory (>6GB) and flash is [I am a potty mouth] with that much memory.

Well I AM using a mac with eight cores....

Yeah, nah. No way I'll believe you there - macs aren't good at flash. the player for macs is junk, complete junk.

anyway, i'll shut up now. So close to getting a mod to close this thread lol

doesn't matter....

Here comes the question since others brought it up:

Line Rider Core Usage Setting

Hotkey Setup

CNR wrote:I start lagging @ 500....I love having an eight core :3

fix'd

Uhh mhenr, i request a better pixels per frame function, since i'm making this high speed track that goes up to 40 pixels, occasionally it goes down to 1 or 2 for some reason. I jus want to keep it at 40 in case it gets too fast and i can't control it thanks ^_^

CNR wrote:I start lagging @ 500k....I love having an eight core :3

Cam has an eight core mac. 30k runs at 15 fps. You're lying.

@ mhenr - macs are not "complete junk" when running flash. I've told you that LR lags worse, if anything, on a dual booted mac in PC mode, right? I've tested it. And I can get 40fps without being in slomo with up to about 2,000 lines. That's definitely not crap in my eyes, and I'm on a mac laptop.

also, just because flash doesn't use multicore doesn't mean it won't run faster on multicore. Other cores can take care of other things that need to be taken care of in the background. Ofc it's not going to run 8x faster, or even 2x faster, but it'll probably be a little bit faster. I've learned quite a bit about multicore this semester in my hardware design class (the prof is basically obsessed with multicore computing)

rabid squirrel wrote: And I can get 40fps without being in slomo with up to about 2,000 lines.

I envy you. My FP is at about 25 fps at 2000 lines. ;_;

bump / back on subject: I'm too lazy to read all the posts and suggestions so don't know if this was already suggested,but:

Would you be able to implement an option to adjust the zoom level of a track by entering in a number? I figure that way it will be a lot easier to use an ideal zoom level for scened tracks that have splits, and have the different recordings exactly the same zoom without having to use one of the default zooms which may not be ideal for the scened track.

So uhh.

hows it doing?

Votale wrote:A lot of people are better than me I suck ._.

I had to quote this -- it's just LOL.

That's true for ME, not you lol.

Suggestions so far:

Line Rider Core Usage Setting (aka using a CPU for greater amounts of lines)

Hotkey Setup

Zoom level via entering a number. I think it would start with zero and go into the negatives for greater distances and the positives for a close up.

Also, maybe a hide icons during recording setting? That would be ossum. And it would help with the I-zoom-in-during editing-and-stuff-gets-pixellated problem, because some people prefer not to have it in their videos.

Camera scripting. Is. A. Must. Seriously. If you don't add this, I'll die.

___________________________________

That's all, imo mhenr.

Could you tell me what would work and what wouldn't, because I want to try it out.

Not for the s***s and giggles of doing it, but if I could try out the alpha version, I could actually tell you what you could do for it, not just the bugs, 'cause that's for beta.

My dad makes games, and I have an understanding of how things work before pre-release and beta testing.

You don't just need suggestions and a good QA, but you also need some stable alpha worked out so people could try it out and tell you what might have been done better with what is in the game so you don't have to keep making different versions of it and can get it done well right off the bat.

Because those reiterations do build on the game, but also add what could have been suggested in the previous version, and take a whole lot more time to do afterwards.

I think a stable open alpha version would do some good whenever it's as stable as can be.

--HG

Harro? Anyone there?

I really like the numbered zoom, that's an amazing idea!
That would be insanely useful especially when trying to zoom in/out wth lag ^^

That suggestion was from SCG. Thank him, not me.

Ihavent forgotten about lr, but I'm rewriting the render engine from scratch.
Also, I CANT USE MULTIPLE CORES OR THREADS WITH FLASH SO STOP ASKING ABOUT IT >_>

When do you think 6.8 will be out?

^that &
Can I have test?

I need a version that has my needs,

6.3elr
8.0r3 (the best one imo)

Here is me inferring for you people.

Hope I get this right.

You are really busy on both the site and the engine for rendering stuff and you are tired of the comments of what to do because you don't have too much time between school and at-home work on site SB's and such.

So this won't be out for a couple of months at most, perhaps more. Correct, or way off?

I'm bored and I want to just say that stuff currently.

mhenr18 wrote:Ihavent forgotten about lr, but I'm rewriting the render engine from scratch.
Also, I CANT USE MULTIPLE CORES OR THREADS WITH FLASH SO STOP ASKING ABOUT IT >_>

make it a native app.

i challenge you