Colt M1911

Watch here

I don't really know what to say. There surely was a point to all this, but I don't get it. Maybe if you introduced it with some context I would've been able to become engaged in this.

Finally a second all squishy track, this is the stuff we NEED
Have we forgotten the underlying context, which is the game and cool tracks bruh
Track was actually funny and impressive even if I didn't get the reference with the ending credits (which now that I have seen, I will go look up so I can find out for myself instead of criticizing you for not providing for me, because that's up to the artist's discretion! You don't owe me anything as a player. )

ScrungleBlumpkus wrote:You don't owe me anything as a player. )

Except there's a difference between playing and making...

Helios Pavonine wrote:

ScrungleBlumpkus wrote:You don't owe me anything as a player. )

Except there's a difference between playing and making...

Or as an audience member, for that matter!

Helios Pavonine wrote:

ScrungleBlumpkus wrote:You don't owe me anything as a player. )

Except there's a difference between playing and making...

Is this really the place for a nomenclature argument? Instead of providing anton with feedback, you just criticized what dap said... He made this track, or he could consider it playing with this physics toy. Why should it matter what you consider it, you can not tell based on the product whether the player considered it making or playing, and even if they considered it one or the other it seems to be quite an arbitrary matter.

^ You're both right, I shouldn't have initiated the discussion like that. But the way Dap phrased his comment, it seemed more like a critique of the current art movement rather than critique of the track. Anyway, discord is probably a better place to discuss this - if you're interested.