COTM September Brainstorm

Yeah, rabid can't do it this month so...I'm doing it ^^
So go post your ideas guise!
lolmyfirstannouncementIfeelsoawesome

I would personally like to do a maze contest with a gimmick of sorts, but of course it's up to you
GOGOGO!

Mazes are overused these days. How about a Pink/Brown line contest?

Livestream 30 second track contest?

how about like a mountain climbing contest, the fastest person to the peak wins? and we could maybe have like a checkpoint (representing a base camp) box and you have to have bosh pass through it. or something like that

^ Cereal's technique kills all those types of contests :/

Rafael wrote:^ Cereal's technique kills all those types of contests :/

I'm the best mayne, I deed it.

Also, I don't know if Raf's idea is going to work. I mean, couldn't people keep hi-jacking the streamer and start streaming over them and then start a big tussle?

45 degree track, 45 lines.

All blue and red scenery!

how about a roulette collab contest. Each week, a group of contestants will be expected to make about 5-15 seconds of a random track style on a random sol.

example:
if we get 24 people to participate (or 22 people with 2 people that would be chosen at random of anyone willing to take a second part) we would get:

6 tracks going at the same time each of which will last anywhere from 20 seconds to a minute.
Who ever winds up going last will be responsible for recording and uploading or getting someone else in their group to do it.

If this wins out, it will take some good organization from who ever organizes the collab, but this could be a close as we will be able to come to an anonymous competition where you don't know who you will be up against until the tracks start coming out and the only ones you know that you're collabing with will be who ever went before you.

signups would consist of stating any week you might be too busy to make a part and whether or now you'd be willing to make a second part in a collab.

Re-run downward speed maze?

^No re-runs. /less creative

An upward speed (compact) maze contest, so thin that it will be super hard to do a multiple line glitch.

i like the mountain climb idea

I think that SCG's idea sounds really interesting, but there are some things that I want to figure out. First off, how would we know who to give the .sol to? We could have the person making the contest tell everyone via pm, but that way sounds sort of lengthy, and we'd have to have some sort of backup leader, just in case the other has to go somewhere.

Second off, how would we decide how many teams we need? I assume you have a solution, but you didn't really explain it well in the post. (Or I'm just dyslexic, one or the other )

After thinking about it, one option that could work better would be that whoever puts it together would pm each group who their partners are and the style they have to work on for the week. Then once each week, they are assigned a new random style that they have to work on. This way everyone will know who their teammates are going to be, but only who ever sets this up will know all the teems and what styles they have to work on.

Teams will be decided by whoever sets this up and will depend on how many enter.
possible solutions:
9: 3 teams of 3 (minimum for this to work)
10: 2 teams of 3 plus 1 team of 4
12: 3 teams of 4
16 : 4 teams of 4 (preferable)
17: 2 teams of 4 plus 3 teams of 3
18: would be 3 team of 4 plus 2 teams of 3

SethComposerGuy wrote:After thinking about it, one option that could work better would be that whoever puts it together would pm each group who their partners are and the style they have to work on for the week. Then once each week, they are assigned a new random style that they have to work on. This way everyone will know who their teammates are going to be, but only who ever sets this up will know all the teems and what styles they have to work on.

Teams will be decided by whoever sets this up and will depend on how many enter.
possible solutions:
9: 3 teams of 3 (minimum for this to work)
10: 2 teams of 3 plus 1 team of 4
12: 3 teams of 4
16 : 4 teams of 4 (preferable)
17: 2 teams of 4 plus 3 teams of 3
18: would be 3 team of 4 plus 2 teams of 3

I like this.