Highspeed manuals VS quirk

Read title

discuss!

IMO highspeed manuals done correctly are very hard, but with quirk its usually dependent on the tricks done. Like, lets say someone makes a track 1:30 long and every frame is affected by some sort of giant evolving Alt fling/asdf, that would be at least 3600 lines if you do 1 line/frame. Slow watching, and slow making it.

Dependent on too many factors, so i'll say highspeed manuquirk is harder.

It's all about the path and how you take it.

Highspeed manuals in CCW loops is equal to highspeed quirk in CCW loops, imo.

It depends.

It's just like flatsledding, in general, flat sledding is generally frowned upon, unless urdoinitrite.

inb4wizzyandvotale

in my opinion both are hard. Although i can do manuals a lot easier than quirk which is why highspeed quirk amazes me so much

I personally reckon highspeed manual is harder than highspeed quirk. when you get to 90-100 or so PP/F you just have masses of room to work with, but when doing manuals applying constant pressure when bosh can sometimes get a bit hairy when he moves further in a single frame than a decently lengthed line.

Highspeed manuals are more frustrating then highspeed quirk.