Linerider: Reduce

I like the flow and style of the track it goes pretty well with the sync of the track. The density was dense but not too dense but overall it was a really nice track.

It was good, but some of the tricks, particularly the manuals, been able to hold a specific trick for longer without panning out into a barrel roll or evolving fling almost every time

Oho, look who used green lines!

Okay, got that out of my system. That flanual to integration at :14 was sex. Awesome stuff there.

/inb4 crisp barrel rolls complaint

This was pretty sweet. The integration was awesome, and the whole track felt nice and flowy.

Also, dat dnb

efrazable wrote:I like the flow and style of the track it goes pretty well with the sync of the track. The density was dense but not too dense but overall it was a really nice track.

I lol'd..

I liked how you used simple flings and manuals but still gave the impression of a more complex track with it's flow and trick use.

not bad. i liek

efrazable wrote:I like the flow and style of the track it goes pretty well with the sync of the track. The density was dense but not too dense but overall it was a really nice track.

Thank you for your words of wisdom.

Shotoku wrote:It was good, but some of the tricks, particularly the manuals, been able to hold a specific trick for longer without panning out into a barrel roll or evolving fling almost every time

Not all tracks have to pan on to another track every 2-3 frames I mean you need some long manuals or flings, that's what makes the track interesting. Other than that thanks for replying

Opal Rider wrote:Oho, look who used green lines!

Okay, got that out of my system. That flanual to integration at :14 was sex. Awesome stuff there.

Yes there are some green lines, I tried not to but I did and thanks for replying.

Kramwood wrote:^ this.

Also I love your evolving flings.

Thanks bro and congratz on LRL.

roflmaoqwerty wrote:/inb4 crisp barrel rolls complaint

This was pretty sweet. The integration was awesome, and the whole track felt nice and flowy.

Also, dat dnb

Yeah I tried to do a long barrel but it somewhat worked but it wasn't too great. Other than that thanks for replying.

Lankher wrote:

efrazable wrote:I like the flow and style of the track it goes pretty well with the sync of the track. The density was dense but not too dense but overall it was a really nice track.

I lol'd..

Alright...

theacp127 wrote:I liked how you used simple flings and manuals but still gave the impression of a more complex track with it's flow and trick use.

Yes it sure did and thanks.

crash2burn wrote:not bad. i liek

Thank you, I'm glad you liked it.

No no, thank you.

Stallie wrote:

Shotoku wrote:It was good, but some of the tricks, particularly the manuals, been able to hold a specific trick for longer without panning out into a barrel roll or evolving fling almost every time

Not all tracks have to pan on to another track every 2-3 frames I mean you need some long manuals or flings, that's what makes the track interesting. Other than that thanks for replying

I think you reversed what I was trying to say...